Skip to content

collaboration icon

Policy Goal 2: Convene a state-local collaborative body.


1. Does the state have a standing collaborative body dedicated to criminal justice and behavioral health?

RATIONALE: As state-level leaders increasingly take shared responsibility for improving behavioral health outcomes and reducing recidivism, collaboration is essential to meet those goals. Behavioral health and criminal justice agencies have different missions and different approaches to service delivery. Yet these systems serve a shared population that cycles through the complicated landscape of state and local criminal justice and behavioral health agencies. Without collaborating and coordinating on providing services to this shared population, criminal justice and behavioral health agencies can duplicate efforts, inadvertently work at cross purposes, and fail to address gaps.  

Further, tackling complex cross-system problems won’t happen overnight. Standing collaborative structures promote lasting, formalized relationships and ongoing problem-solving that will outlast changing administrations. Collaborative bodies with state and local representation spanning a range of systems, sectors, and branches of government are essential to building a state-local feedback loop that ensures state policymaking is responsive to and reflective of local needs. 

.


tools iconWays to do it

  • Issue an executive order establishing or repurposing an existing collaborative body.  
  • Convene a collaborative body through a state criminal justice or behavioral health agency, such as through interagency policy agreements or administrative order. 
  • Pass legislation establishing a collaborative body, such as a state commission. 
  • Convene a standing advisory body through the judiciary, tasked with looking at the problem through the lens of matters of law, the legal system, or the administration of justice and making recommendations for system improvements.  
  • States with existing time-limited task forces or commissions may consider formalizing and funding a longer-term, standing collaborative body tasked with addressing a specific intersection, population, or problem. 


bulb iconThings to consider

  • Ensure the collaborative body is tasked with making recommendations to the legislature or otherwise directly informing state policymaking, serving as a state-local feedback loop.    
  • Create a mechanism for meaningful integration of the perspectives of people with lived experience of the criminal justice and/or behavioral health systems.   
  • Designate funded staff to oversee and coordinate the collaborative body’s activities, including convening meetings, setting agendas, and advancing policy priorities. 
  • Empower this group to allocate specified funding tied to its policy recommendations and measurable goals.  
  • Advise on state and local funding priorities and how resources can be leveraged across systems and agencies to support common goals. 
  • Recommended state-level collaborative body mission and goals: 
    • Advise the state on evidence-based, promising, and best practices for responding to the behavioral health needs of people who are currently in the criminal justice system, as well as strategies to prevent criminal justice involvement.  
    • Identify the current and future barriers experienced by people in the criminal justice system who have behavioral health needs, including those related to improving social determinants of health and coordinating complex care needs. 
    • Identify and address training and technical assistance needs of counties and localities, such as creating funding opportunities, providing technical assistance, creating state guidance, and housing a clearinghouse of available resources.   
  • Recommended composition: A statutorily defined planning group representing both state and local perspectives, including the following:  
    • State agency heads, or their representatives, across key criminal justice and health agencies, as well as across all branches of state government   
    • Representatives from the county level, representing criminal justice and behavioral health  
    • Members of the public, particularly people with lived experience of the criminal justice system and family members  
    • Representative(s) from statewide advocacy organization(s)  
    • Local and state housing/homelessness agencies and service providers 

.

State Examples

The state established the Committee on Mental Health and the Justice System, by Supreme Court administrative order, to identify ways for the courts and other justice system stakeholders to effectively address how the justice system responds to people with behavioral health needs. The interagency committee includes court officials and judges, treatment providers, law enforcement officials, and mental health advocates. 

The state established the Committee on Mental Health and the Justice System, by Supreme Court administrative order, to identify ways for the courts and other justice system stakeholders to effectively address how the justice system responds to people with behavioral health needs. The interagency committee includes court officials and judges, treatment providers, law enforcement officials, and mental health advocates. 

The Mental Health and Justice Advisory Committee (MHJAC) provides guidance and structure to ensure statewide coordination and effectiveness of Pennsylvanias criminal justice and mental health systems. It is jointly run by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD), which was established through statute as part of the executive branch, and Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (OMHSAS).

PCCD and OMHSAS make joint funding decisions through this committee for funds that go to counties for various justice and behavioral health strategies. The task force is composed of representatives from state agencies, county leadership, and the courts; district attorneys; public defenders; people who have been in the criminal justice system; families; and other state and local criminal justice and mental health advocates and practitioners.  

State law established the Substance Misuse Prevention Oversight and Advisory Council to strengthen the state’s response to the opioid crisis by increasing coordination between state and local governments. The council includes a specific focus on engaging law enforcement to reduce the sale and use of opioids and to connect people to effective treatment and recovery services. 

.


Resources


2. Has the state formed a time-limited task force or committee that includes state and local cross-sector partners to examine and implement solutions to high-priority issues at the intersection of criminal justice and behavioral health?

RATIONALE: In some cases, it may be necessary for a state to form an action-oriented task force or committee to target a specific pressing issue or need. These task forces/committees may be connected to a broader initiative and/or mandate (see Policy Goal 1). They may also overlap with the mission and composition of other standing collaborative bodies (see Policy Goal 2, Policy Question 1), but are typically smaller in composition to maximize efficiency, are time-limited, and have a specific purpose. Forming such a task force/committee can  

  1. Make it possible to home in on pressing areas that need the most attention or have even reached crisis levels;  
  2. Allow members to direct their energy and action toward the pressing issue or need at hand, minimizing the likelihood of being pulled in other directions; and  
  3. Help coordinate and leverage responses and resources across sectors and systems. 

Ideally, the task force/committee would not only be able to successfully direct solutions to address the issue or need at hand, but its work would also inform broader, statewide strategy (e.g., work conducted by task forces focused on state responses to the opioid epidemic could inform broader goals to improve SUD systems and broader criminal justice-behavioral health efforts). 


tools iconWays to do it

  • Issue an executive order establishing a task force or committee paired with a statewide commitment.  
  • Convene a task force or committee through a state criminal justice or behavioral health agency, such as through interagency policy agreements or administrative order. 
  • Pass legislation establishing a task force or committee. 
  • Convene a time-limited task force or ad hoc committee through the judiciary tasked with looking at the problem through the lens of matters of law, the legal system, or the administration of justice and making recommendations for system improvements.  

bulb iconThings to consider

  • Criminal Justice-Behavioral Health task forces/committees should be 
    • Time limited; 
    • Multisector and multisystem, composed of key state and local policymakers and stakeholders;   
    • Guided by a specific charge and goal (can be tied to a statewide mandate and/or broader initiative); and  
    • Action oriented, typically focused on developing an action plan that would then be presented to high-level leadership for approval to secure buy-in and resources.  

State Examples

Georgia’s Behavioral Health Reform and Innovation Commission is a time-limited cross-systems collaborative body charged with conducting a comprehensive review of the behavioral health care system in Georgia (see Policy Goal 1). The commission is slated to convene and deliver annual reports and policy and practice recommendations from 2020-2025.  

Georgia’s Behavioral Health Reform and Innovation Commission is a time-limited cross-systems collaborative body charged with conducting a comprehensive review of the behavioral health care system in Georgia (see Policy Goal 1). The commission is slated to convene and deliver annual reports and policy and practice recommendations from 2020-2025.  

After participating in a series of national initiatives and a Midwest regional summit, the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts and Supreme Court of Illinois convened the time-limited Illinois Mental Health Task Force. From January to September 2022, the task force convened cross-system partners across three branches to conduct system mapping in each of the states five judicial districts, enhance relationships across systems, share evidence-based and best practices, and develop an Action Plan to better connect people in the justice system to the continuum of behavioral health care. With support from the State Justice Institute, the task force partnered with the National Center of State Courts for technical assistance.

In response to a rising number of people held in detention awaiting competency restoration, the state’s chief justice, with support from the governor, created a task force in 2016 that met over the course of seven months to assess the issue and deliver recommendations to address it. A final report was delivered to the chief justice and the governor, outlining 15 recommendations. An oversight council was then established to track progress and outcomes, and some of the recommendations were implemented, including a pilot for mental health screening and assessment in jail and the creation of a crisis services grant program.